
In early April 2025, a group of committees within the House of Representatives published a comprehensive report detailing the alarming extent of potential criminal activities associated with ActBlue, the primary fundraising platform for the Democratic Party that has long been under suspicion for illicit conduct.
On April 2, the committees announced the findings in a press release, stating that their report uncovered “widespread fraud” within ActBlue. They noted, “Today, the House Judiciary Committee, the Committee on House Administration, and the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform have issued a joint interim staff report . . . [that] indicates that ActBlue has made its fraud-prevention policies ‘more lenient’ on two occasions in 2024, despite the significant fraud occurring on the platform, including from foreign entities.”
Furthermore, they emphasized that ActBlue’s personnel displayed a lack of seriousness regarding the fraud issue, stating, “Internal documents reveal that ActBlue executives and staff recognize that both foreign and domestic fraudulent actors are taking advantage of the platform, yet they do not regard the threat with the seriousness it deserves. In fact, they sought to conceal the modifications to prevent triggering discussions about fraud on the platform.”
Building on this, it was observed that ActBlue executives prioritized DEI over addressing the issue of fraud, with the incidence of fraud even increasing after they began to notice suspicious activities. The report indicated: “For instance, ActBlue’s training manual for new employees in fraud prevention advised them to ‘look for reasons to accept contributions,’ instead of erring on the side of caution by flagging questionable donations. Internal communications further disclose that, rather than aiming to reduce or eliminate fraud, ActBlue’s chief fraud-prevention officer was prepared to tolerate an increase of 10 percent in fraud while concentrating on DEI.
As another illustration, the press release highlighted that ActBlue unlawfully permitted hundreds of foreign IP addresses, likely indicating foreign individuals, to contribute using prepaid cards. It stated, “Moreover, within a thirty-day period during September and October 2024, ActBlue identified 237 distinct donations made from foreign IP addresses utilizing domestic prepaid cards.”
In the report itself, the committees pointed out that ActBlue was undermining the integrity of American elections by permitting foreign donations, asserting, “The Committee on House Administration, the Committee on the Judiciary, and the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform are responsible for safeguarding the integrity of American elections. Accordingly, the Committees are investigating claims that ActBlue, a prominent political fundraising entity, allowed malicious actors, including foreign entities, to exploit its online platform for fraudulent political contributions.
Summarizing the collective evidence, they stated, “This interim staff report outlines the Committees’ concerning initial findings. Internal documents provided to the Committees by ActBlue and its fraud-prevention partner, Sift, reveal a lack of dedication to combating fraud and illustrate a sense of complacency within ActBlue’s fraud-prevention team. In straightforward terms, the documents indicate a fundamentally unserious attitude towards fraud prevention at ActBlue—an approach that has allowed for significant fraud operations on the primary fundraising platform for Democrats.”
The legislators remarked, while outlining the general circumstances, “In summary, the internal documents and communications of ActBlue depict a troubling scenario: despite numerous occurrences of fraudulent contributions to Democratic campaigns and initiatives from both domestic and international sources, ActBlue is failing to show a genuine commitment to preventing fraud.”