During a session with the House, far-left Representative Jasmine Crockett experienced a significant outburst regarding Attorney General Pam Bondi’s threat to charge her for the offensive comments she made about Elon Musk. Crockett made an unsuccessful attempt to divert attention from her aggressive rhetoric by delivering a poorly articulated tirade against the Attorney General.
For context, while addressing the radical leftist group known as “Tesla Takedown,” she exclaimed, “On March 29, it’s my birthday. All I want to see happen on my birthday is for Elon to be taken down…I have learned, as I serve on the DOGE Oversight committee, that there is only one language that the people that are in charge understand right now, and that language is money.”
Regardless, Crockett’s outburst was recorded on April 2, 2025. She began by stating, “To have the sitting Attorney General go on, and I refer to it as faux news. I know some of you appreciate it, but to me, it is fake for her to appear on Fox News and then choose to send a threat to me. It was inappropriate, because she is the highest law enforcement official in this country.”
Continuing her erratic statements, she remarked, “People are observing, and they are absorbing this information, and they are convinced that simply because I chose to exercise my right to free speech, which I am not restricted from doing, she then sought to politicize an issue that should remain non-political.”
Expressing her bias, she stated, “I do not like Elon Musk. I will say it 50,000 times. I do not like him. I do not appreciate that. He is out there firing people. I believe he is a crook. The rest of us cannot simply sit idly by and obtain any federal contracts we desire.”
With more fervor than grammatical accuracy, she proclaimed, “The rest of us cannot just sit around and receive law enforcement, having them somehow designated as federal law enforcement to safeguard him. The rest of us cannot have our dealerships shielded by the federal government.”
Demonstrating her limited grasp of the circumstances, she continued, “That is an individual who operates above the law for whatever reason, simply because he possesses a significant amount of wealth, more than anyone else. And indeed, I am pleased to note that on my birthday, as I mentioned, there were peaceful protests worldwide against him, as he represents a problem.”
Not yet completed, she remarked, “Therefore, one should never have an individual in such a high position who would threaten a sitting member of Congress, especially when she was fully aware that I explicitly instructed the protesters to consult with legal counsel. This is a directive I have consistently provided throughout my history of advising individuals to exercise their constitutional rights.”
You can view the clip here:
